Long story short: yes.
The research I had helped me adjust my FMP slightly. Though I'm still going with a children's book, with morals, I not know it's not the most important thing. Artwork and illustrations speak out to kids, and sometimes even parents. This helped me realise that most of my time and work should be on the images in the book.
The research itself could've been slightly better. If I had the time, I would've loved to interview more children with a variety of ages. The child I interviewed was my sister, and this has it's peaks and lows. For instance, it seems biased that I interviewed my own family. However, I actually see this as a good thing, as I think other children wouldn't be as open and ask as many questions as she did.
I would've also liked to conduct an online survey, but I was more focused on the parent's of the child...(my parents).
The secondary research was god, and by reviewing the books myself I got to voice an opinion. I also looked at an article where the writer kinda agreed with me, but raised other points. This backed up my primary research.
No comments:
Post a Comment